Везде
M.K. Petrov about the Intellectual Revolution of the 17th Century
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
M.K. Petrov about the Intellectual Revolution of the 17th Century
Annotation
PII
S004287440003626-3-
DOI
10.31857/S004287440003626-3
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Gennady Drach 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1112-4928
Affiliation: Institute of Philosophy and Social and Political Sciences Southern Federal University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
116-123
Abstract

The article presents an analytical review of the work Logos, the Language of Adam and Wharf. Linguistic Aspects of the Intellectual Revolution of the 17th Century written by M. K. Petrov (1923–1987). The article shows that the questions of the categorical structure of the language and the differences between the inflectional and analytic languages, considered by Petrov, make it possible to substantially supplement and clarify the concepts of linguistic relativism and cultural diversity. Historical, philosophical and historical-cultural erudition allowed Petrov to discern a historical fact of linguistic, cultural and even wider – civilizational (since every civilization that ever existed is an embodied type of culture) relativity through these issues, and to see science as a central link in the European cultural project that cannot be explained from the point of view of panlogism and through a historical retrospective.

The linguistic aspects of the intellectual revolution of the 17th century, researched by the author,, shed light on the relationship of late scholasticism to Aristotle, on the internal transformation of theology, which turns into "natural theology" and opens the door to natural science. The picture of the emergence of experienced natural science, created by the author, has not lost its relevance to this day. The main areas of research are focused on the analysis of Aristotle, Bacon and Hobbes texts, substantiating the differences between inflectional analytic languages. Thanks to the published materials, Petrov's views on Aristotle, Bacon and Hobbes and the theoretical assumptions of experimental science in Europe are not only concretized, but also the general reconstruction of the Western cultural tradition, which the intellectual revolution of the 17th century. 

Keywords
M.K. Petrov, philosophy, science, culture, theology, intellectual revolution, categorial structures, inflectional languages, analytical languages
Acknowledgment
The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant N 18-011-01229, “Civilizational Research in the South of Russia”.
Received
14.02.2019
Date of publication
19.02.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
927
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S004287440003626-3-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 29.12.2018
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Antologiya 1969 – Antologiya mirovoj filosofii. T. 1. Filosofiya Drevnosti i Srednevekov'ya. Chast' 2. M.: Mysl', 1969 (Anthology of World Philosophy, Russian Translation).

2. Behkon 1971 – Behkon F. Velikoe vosstanovlenie nauk // Behkon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1971 (Bacon, Francis, Instauratio Magna, Russian Translation).

3. Behkon 1972 – Behkon F. Novyj Organon // Behkon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1972 (Bacon, Francis, Novum Organum scientiarum, Russian Translation).

4. Gobbs 1989 – Gobbs T. Osnov filosofii chast' pervaya. O tele // Gobbs T. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1989 (Hobbes, Thomas, Elements of Philosophy, The First Section, Concerning Body, Russian Translation).

5. Marks, Ehngel's 1955 – Marks K. K kritike gegelevskoj filosofii prava // Marks K., Ehngel's F. Sochineniya. T. 1. M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1955 (Marx, Karl, Zur Kritik der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie, Russian Translation).

6. Petrov (per.) 1966 – Nauka o nauke (sbornik statej). Per. s angl. M.K. Petrova. M.: Progress, 1966 (The Science of Science, Selected Texts, Translated Into Russian by Mikhail K. Petrov).

7. Petrov 1973 – Petrov M.K. Yazyk i kategorial'nye struktury // Naukovedenie i istoriya kul'tury. Rostov-na-Donu: RGU, 1973. S. 58–82 (Petrov, Mikhail K., Language and categorical structures, in Russian).

8. Petrov 1976 – Petrov M.K. Logos, yazyk Adama i Uorf. Lingvisticheskie aspekty intellektual'noj revolyutsii XVII v. // Lichnyj arkhiv G.D. Petrovoj. F. 1/1. Op. 1. Ed. khr. 1 (Petrov, Mikhail K., “Logos, the language of Adam and Whorf. Linguistic Aspects of the Intellectual Revolution of the XVIIth Century”, Galy D. Petrova’s Archive, in Russian).

9. Petrov 1996 – Petrov M.K. Istoriko-filosofskie issledovaniya. M.: ROSSPEhN, 1996 (Petrov, Mikhail K., Studies in the History of Philosophy, in Russian).

10. Petrov 2015 – Petrov M.K. Problemy determinizma v drevnegrecheskoj filosofii klassicheskogo perioda. Otv. red. G.V. Drach. Rostov-na-Donu: YuFU, 2015 (Petrov, Mikhail K., Problems of determinism in ancient Greek philosophy of the classical period, in Russian).

11. Abushenko 2002 – Abushenko V.L. Petrov Mikhail Konstantinovich // Vsemirnaya ehntsiklopediya: Filosofiya XX vek. M.: AST; Mn.: Kharvest, 2002. S. 560–566.

12. Dubrovin, Tischenko 1996 – Dubrovin V.N., Tischenko Yu.R. Sud'ba filosofa v inter'ere ehpokhi // Petrov M.K. Istoriko-filosofskie issledovaniya. M.: ROSSPEhN, 1996. S. 3–15.

13. Kosareva 1977 – Kosareva L.M. Predmet nauki. M.: Nauka, 1977.

14. Kosareva 1981 – Kosareva L.M. Problema stanovleniya sovremennoj nauki v zapadnoj istoriografii nauki. M.: AN SSSR, 1981. S. 5–37.

15. Peretyat'kin 2013 – Peretyat'kin G.F. Yazyk, myshlenie, real'nost' (M.K. Petrov i postmodernizm) // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo. 2013. № 16 (159). Vypusk 25. S. 69–79.

16. Sokolov 2012 – Sokolov V.V. Filosofiya kak istoriya filosofii. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 2012.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate