Везде
A PROBLEMATIC FIELD STRUCTURE OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A PROBLEMATIC FIELD STRUCTURE OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY
Annotation
PII
S0205-95920000338-8-
DOI
10.31857/S20000338-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana N. Kostromina  Irina Mironenko N. Grishina
Abstract
Questions are posed to determine a problem field of personality psychology and its internal structure. A significance and interrelation of various directions being actively developed today are discussed. Special autors' attention is paid to an existential approach, the ideas of which are connected with challenges of modernity and with problems of modern person, as well as to psychology of everyday life, which allows to study a real person in a real world. The specifics of Russian tradition of psychological research of personality and its development prospects are considered. The authors offer an understanding of subject and content of personality psychology as an interconnection of structural and functional fields (personality traits and properties), contextual (psychology of everyday life: life scenarios, life strategies, life style, etc.) and existential (existential identity, existential experience, meanings of life, etc.) ones.
Keywords
personality psychology, problem field of personality psychology, subject approach, contextual level, existential approach, psychology of everyday life.
Number of purchasers
8
Views
797
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S0205-95920000338-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 02.10.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials




    

  1. Abul'khanova K.A., Volovikova M.I. Psikhosotsial'nyj i sub'ektnyj podkhody k issledovaniyu lichnosti v usloviyakh sotsial'nykh izmenenij // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2007. T. 28. № 5. S. 5–15.
    2. 

  2. Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i  raznoobraziya  // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. T. 8. № 40. URL: http://psystudy.ru/num/2015v8n40/1109- asmolov40 (data obrascheniya 15.09.2017).
    3. 

  3. Volovikova M.I. Istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie issledovanij i perspektivy razvitiya psikhologii lichnosti // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2012. T. 33. № 1. S. 20–29.
    4. 

  4. Volovikova M.I. Predstavlenie russkikh o  nravstvennom ideale. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2005.
    5. 

  5. Volovikova M.I. Institutsional'noe stanovlenie psikhologii lichnosti kak oblasti nauchnogo issledovaniya v Rossijskoj akademii nauk // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya lichnosti: istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy / Pod red. M.I. Volovikovoj, A.L. Zhuravleva, N.E. Kharlamenkovoj. M.: Izdvo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016. S. 23–42.
    6. 

  6. Volovikova M.I., Kharlamenkova N.E. Lichnost' kak otkrytaya sistema // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya lichnosti: istoriya, sovremennoe sostoyanie, perspektivy / Pod red. M.I. Volovikovoj, A.L. Zhuravleva, N.E. Kharlamenkovoj. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.S. 5–22.
    7. 

  7. Vygotskij L.S. Sobr. sochinenij. V 6 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1982. T. 1.
    8. 

  8. Grishina N.V., Kostromina S.N. Psikhologiya lichnosti: pereosmyslenie traditsionnykh podkhodov v kontekste vyzovov sovremennosti // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. T. 10. № 32. URL: http://psystudy. com/index.php/num/2017v10n52/1405-grishina52.html (data obrascheniya 15.09.2017).
    9. 

  9. Grishina N.V. Situatsionnyj podkhod i ego ehmpiricheskie prilozheniya // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. T. 5. № 24.http://psystudy.ru/index.php/ num/2012v5n24/710- (data obrascheniya 15.09.2017).
    10. 

  10. Grishina N.V. Izmenenie zhiznennoj situatsii: situatsionnyj podkhod  // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6. № 30.http://psystudy.ru/ num/2013v6n30/860-grishina30 (data obrascheniya 15.09.2017).
    11. 

  11. Dzhidar'yan I.A. Vera, nadezhda, lyubov': optimisticheskaya triada chuvstv // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2011. T. 32. № 6. S. 5–17.
    12. 

  12. Zhuravlev A.L., Kharlamenkova N.E. Psikhologiya lichnosti kak otkrytoj i  razvivayuschejsya sistemy (K yubileyu L.I. Antsyferovoj)  // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2009. T. 30. № 6. C. 30–39.
    13. 

  13. Zhuravleva N.A. Dinamika tsennostnykh orientatsij lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2006.
    14. 

  14. Zhuravleva N.A. Psikhologiya sotsial'nykh izmenenij: tsennostnyj podkhod. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2013.
    15. 

  15. Znakov V.V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2016.
    16. 

  16. Kolantaevskaya A.S., Grishina N.V., Bazarov T.Yu. Stilevye osobennosti samodeterminatsii v situatsii zhiznennykh izmenenij // Vestnik S.- Peterburgskogo un-ta. Seriya 16. 2016. Vyp. 4. S. 51–62.
    17. 

  17. Kostromina S.N. Psikhologiya professional'nogo razvitiya na ehtape obucheniya v vuze//Professional'no-lichnostnoe razvitie buduschego spetsialista: sbornik statej / Pod red. N.V. Bordovskoj. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2012. S. 25–75.
    18. 

  18. Leont'ev D.A. Novye orientiry v  psikhologii: ot neobkhodimogo k vozmozhnomu // Voprosy psikhologii. 2011. № 1. S. 3–27.
    19. 

  19. Leont'ev D.A. Ehkzistentsial'nyj podkhod v sovremennoj psikhologii lichnosti // Voprosy psikhologii. 2016. № 3. S. 3–15.
    20. 

  20. Myasischev V.N. Lichnost' i nevrozy. L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1960.
    21. 

  21. Nartova-Bochaver S.K. Razvitie idej L.I. Antsyferovoj o metodologii prakticheskoj psikhologii lichnosti // Psikhologicheskij zhurnal. 2014. T. 35. № 6. C. 35–45.
    22. 

  22. Psikhologicheskoe zdorov'e lichnosti i  dukhovnonravstvennye problemy sovremennogo rossijskogo obschestva / Otv. red. A.L. Zhuravlev, M.I. Volovikova, T.V. Galkina. M.: Izd-vo “Institut psikhologii RAN”, 2014.
    23. 

  23. Rubinshtejn C.L. Osnovy obschej psikhologii: V 2 t. M.: Pedagogika. 1989. T. 2.
    24. 

  24. Rubinshtejn S.L. Bytie i soznanie. Chelovek i mir. SPb.: Piter, 2003.
    25. 

  25. Ehmmons R. Psikhologiya vysshikh ustremlenij: motivatsiya i dukhovnost' lichnosti. M.: Smysl, 2004.
    26. 

  26. Yurevich A.V. Sistemnyj krizis psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. 1999. № 2. S. 3–12.
    27. 

  27. Back V.D., Vazire S. The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research // European journal of personality. 2015. V. 29. Is. 2. P. 296–307.
    28. 

  28. Geukes K., van Zalk M.H.W., Back M.D. Understanding personality development: an integrative state process model  //International journal of behavioral development. 2017. P. 0165025416677847.
    29. 

  29. Gosling S. No excuses, it’s time to study real people in the real world //Abstract Book of 18th European Conference on Personality. July, 2016. P. 115.
    30. 

  30. Harari G.M., Lane N.D., Wang R., Crosier B.S., Campbell A.T., Gosling S.D. Using smart phones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges // Perspectives on psychological science. 2016. V. 11. Is. 6. P. 838–854.
    31. 

  31. Laurenceau J.-P., Bolger N. Analyzing diary and intensive longitudinal data from dyads //Handbook of research methods for studying daily life / Eds M. Mehl, T. Conner. New York: Guilford, 2012. P. 407–422.
    32. 

  32. Machell K., Kashdan T.B., Short J.L., Neziek J.B. Relationships between meaning in life, social and achievement events, and positive and negative affect in daily life  //Journal of personality. 2015. V. 83. Is. 3. P. 287–298.
    33. 

  33. Neziek J.B., Newman D.B., Thrash N.M. A daily diary study of relationships between feelings of gratitude and well-being // Journal of positive psychology. 2017. V. 12. Is. 4. P. 323–332.
    34. 

  34. Reitz A.K., Motti-Stefanidi F., Asendorpf J.B. Me, us, and them: Testing sociometer theory in a socially diverse real-life context // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2016. V. 110. № 6. P. 908–920.
    35. 

  35. Vazire S. Who knows what about a person? The SelfOther Knowledge Asymmetry (SOKA) model //Journal of personality and social psychology. 2010. V. 28. P. 281–300.
    36. 

  36. Vazire S., Gosling S.D. e-Perceptions: Personality impressions based on personal websites // Journal of personality and social psychology. 2004. V. 87. Is. 1. P. 123–132.
    37. 

  37. Vazire S., Lucas R. Personality psychology in the postreplicability world // Abstract Book of 18th European Conference on Personality. July, 2016. P. 114.
    38. 

  38. Vazire S., Wilson T.D. (Eds.). Handbook of Self-Knowledge. New York: Guilford, 2012.
    39. 

  39. Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans// Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America. 2015. V. 112. № 4. P. 1036–1040.
    40.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate