Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of Power–Property  and X-Y matrices

Bessonova, Olga

doi:10.31857/S086904990000616-9

Home>Issue 4>Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"

Annotation

PII

S086904990000616-9-

DOI

10.31857/S086904990000616-9

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Olga Bessonova Send message

Affiliation: Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk

Edition

Issue 4

Pages

129-144

Abstract

The article presents the results of the integral-institutional paradigm, which is a new tool for analyzing institutional evolution and the historical path of Russian society. In this paradigm, the market and razdatok (non-market economies) are viewed both as universal development mechanisms and as "equal hands" of the state. The confrontation between market and razdatok economies is replaced in the 21st century synthesis of market institutions and razdatok. Inclusive synthesis in the form of contractual razdatok gives rise to a new institutional matrix of the social state and democracy for the economies, both with the market and with the razdatok prior development. This is the key difference of the new paradigm from the concepts of "power-property" and "X-Y matrices", which are based on antagonistic dichotomies and pre-set results.

Keywords

integral institutional paradigm, power-property, open access social order, quasi-market, contractual razdatok.

Received

18.08.2018

Date of publication

08.10.2018

Number of purchasers

Views

1920

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Previous versions

S086904990000616-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.08.2018

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Bessonova O. Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices" // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – 2018. – Issue 4 C. 129-144 . URL: https://onsras.ru/s013160950003772-3-1/?version_id=7479. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9
MLA	Bessonova, Olga "Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices"." Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 4 (2018).:129-144. DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9
APA	Bessonova O. (2018). Integral-institutional paradigm and the Russian way: overcoming the defects of the concepts of "Power–Property" and "X-Y matrices". Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. no. 4, pp.129-144 DOI: 10.31857/S086904990000616-9

References

1. Avstrijskaya shkola v politicheskoj ehkonomii (1992) M.: Ehkonomika.

2. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson D. (2015) Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nischety. M.:ACT.

3. Bessonova O.Eh. (2006) Obschaya teoriya institutsional'nykh transformatsij kak novaya kartina mira // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 2. S. 130–142.

4. Bessonova O.Eh. (2015) Rynok i razdatok v rossijskoj matritse: ot konfrontatsii k integratsii. M.: ROSSPEhN.

5. Bessonova O.Eh. (2007) Fenomen teorii institutsional'nykh matrits: restavratsiya ustarevshej paradigmy // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. № 2. S. 23–33.

6. Blok F. (2004) Roli gosudarstva v khozyajstve // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. № 2 (5). S. 37–56 (ecsoc.hse.ru).

7. Kirdina S.G. (2000) Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii, M.: TEIS.

8. Klark D. (2011) Za ramkami gosudarstvennogo i chastnogo? Transformatsiya smeshannoj modeli blagosostoyaniya // Zhurnal issledovanij sotsial'noj politiki. № 9. S. 151–168.

9. Kolganov A. (2017) K kritike kontseptsii "vlasti-sobstvennosti" // Voprosy ehkonomiki. № 7. S. 79–95.

10. Kun T. (2001) Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsij. M.: AST.

11. Nort D., Uollis D., Vajngast B. (2011) Nasilie i sotsial'nye poryadki. Kontseptual'nye ramki dlya interpretatsii pis'mennoj istorii chelovechestva. M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gajdara.

12. Nureev R. M. (2009) Rossiya: varianty institutsional'nogo razvitiya. M.: Norma.

13. Pliskevich N.M. (2015) Transformatsiya sistemy vlasti-sobstvennosti v Rossii: regional'nyj aspekt. Mogut li regiony nachat' svoj put' k modernizatsii? // Mir Rossii. № 2. S. 89–104.

14. Chernysh M. F. (2015) Teoriya institutsional'nykh matrits: kriticheskij analiz // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 10. S. 74–83.

15. Hayden G. F. (2017) An Evaluation of Institutional Matrices Theory Which Was Designed to Illustrate Differences Between Russian and Western Political Economies // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 467–475 (http:// dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1321404).

16. Klimina A. (2016) The Role of Culture, Historicity, and Human Agency in the Evolution of the State: A Case against Culture of Fatalism // Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 50. No. 2. Pp. 557–565 (https://doi.org/10. 1080/00213624.2016. 1179064).

17. Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. (1993) Ed. by Grand J.L. and W. Bartlett. London: Palgrave Macmillan (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22873-7).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate

References

Comments

Via social network