Везде
STRATEGIES OF COMPANIES IN THE SITUATION OF REGULATORY PLURALISM IN THE GLOBAL WORLD
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
STRATEGIES OF COMPANIES IN THE SITUATION OF REGULATORY PLURALISM IN THE GLOBAL WORLD
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Tulaeva 
Edition
Volume 376 Issue 8
Pages
108-118
Abstract
The article analyzes the situation of regulatory pluralism and the behavior of companies in its conditions; describes the main factors that contribute to the emergence of this phenomenon. The article demonstrates how companies and other groups of actors in the process of implementing established norms in a situation of regulatory pluralism form a new understanding of regulatory institutions. These ideas are converted into social practices that lead to the transformation of traditional relations between subjects and objects of regulation.
Keywords
regulatory pluralism, social regulation, globalization
Date of publication
01.08.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
467
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Bek U. Obschestvo riska: na puti k drugomu modernu. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2000.


Toffler Eh. Tret'ya volna. M.: “Izdatel'stvo AST”, 2010.


Bartley T. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the Rice of Transnational Private Regulation ofLabor and Environmental Conditions // American Journal of Sociology. 2007. Vol. 113. R. 297–351.


Berman R. Global Legal Pluralism // Southern California Review. 2007. Vol. 80. P. 1155–1189.


Braithwaite J. Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies // World Development. 2006. Vol. 34.№ 5. P. 884–898.


Borck J., Coglianese C. Beyond compliance: explaining business participation in voluntary environmentalprograms // C. Parker, V. Lehmann Nielsen (eds). Explaining Compliance: business responses toregulation. 2011. R. 305–324.


Edelman L., Talesh Sh. To comply or not to comply – that is not the question: how organizations constructthe meaning of compliance // C. Parker, V. Lehmann Nielsen (eds). Explaining Compliance: businessresponses to regulation. 2011. R. 103–122.


Ewick P., Silbey S. The common place of law: stories from everyday life. Chicago, the University ofChicago Press, 1998.


Griffiths J. What is Legal Pluralism? // Journal of Legal Pluralism. 1986. № 24. R. 3–55.


Haufler V. Global Governance and the Private Sector. In Global Corporate Power / Ed. by C. May. CO:Lynner Rienner. 2006. P. 95–105.


Hutter B. The Role of Non-State Actors in Regulation. Discussion Paper // The London School ofEconomics and Political Science. April 2006.


Kobrin S. Back to the Future: Neomedievalism and the postmodern digital world economy //Journal ofInternational Affairs. 1998. № 51(2). P. 361–387.


Kvale S. The Qualitive research interview // Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 1983. № 14.P. 171–196.


Meidinger E. Beyond Westphalia: Competitive legalization in emerging transnational regulatory systems //Law and legalization in Transnational Relations / Ed. by Chr. Brutsch, D. Lehmkuhl. Oxford and NewYork: Riutledge, 2007. P. 126–144.


Merry S. Legal Pluralism // Law and Society Review. Vol. 22. 1988. P. 869–896.


Michaels R. The Restatement of Non-state Law: the State, Choice of Law, and the Challenge FromGlobal Legal Pluralism // The Wayne Law Review. 2005. Vol. 51. R. 1209–1258


O’Rourke D. Market Movements. Nongovernmental Organization Strategies to Influence GlobalProduction and Consumption.// Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2005. № 9(1–2). P. 115–128.


Parker Chr., Nielsen V. Introduction from regulation to compliance // C. Parker, V. Lehmann Nielsen(eds). Explaining Compliance: business responses to regulation. 2011. R. 3–35.


Scott C. Regulation everything: from mega- to meta-regulation // Administration. 2012. Vol. 60. № 1.P. 61–89.


Stone Chr. Where the Law ends: the social control of corporate behavior. New York: Harper and Row,1975.


Tamanaha B. Z. The folly of the “social scientific” concept of legal pluralism // Journal of Law and Society.1993. № 20. P. 39–55.


Teubner G. Global Bukowina: Legal Pluralism in the World Society // Global Law without a State / Ed. byG. Teubner. Dartmouth, Aldershot, 1997. P. 3–28.


Tilly Ch. Welcome to the Seventeenth Century // The Twenty-First Century Firm / Ed. by DiMaggio P.Princeton University Press, 2001. R. 200–209.


Toffler A. The Adaptive Corporation. Aldershot, Gower, 1985.


Vogel D. The market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. BrookingInstitution Press, Washington, D.C., 2005.


Volkov V. Hostile Enterprise Takeovers: Russia’s Economy in 1998–2002 // Review of Central and EastEuropean Law. 2004. № 4. P. 527–548.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate